Monday 20 May 2013

Why everybody needs a little Sheldon in their life.

Sheldon Cooper (Jim Parsons) of The Big Bang Theory is the only character holding the franchise together. Odd, dysfunctional and often downright rude and objectionable he is the lynchpin on which the whole franchise now rests. No longer gripped by the off and on relationship of Penny and Leonard, the not so subtle references to Raj being a little “sweet” and the show even seems to be running thin on Jewish jokes to throw at Howard it is now often up to Sheldon to save each and every episode with his misunderstandings of the world and childish naivety.


It seems that even the writing staff knows it. In episode Seventeen of season Four The Toast Derivation the group realize that Sheldon is the one that holds their group together and without him nothing really seems as interesting as it should anymore. It appears that now the rest of the group from that moment on are simply supporting characters in “The Sheldon Cooper Half Hour”.

Although the show has now moved on to try and become more of an ensemble piece: Raj now has a girlfriend who is even more damaged than he is, Bernadette and Howard and married and living together and even Stewart from the comic book store got an outing when Howard was in space. The only real interest I now have is in the development of the relationship between Sheldon and Amy. They’ve taken the “will they, won’t they” to a whole new level of sexual tension, the closest that the pair have come is in the latest episode The Love Spell Potential where the two retire to Sheldon’s bedroom to let the die in dungeons and dragons do the talking taking their pieces into some compromising positions, and often I find that the screen time that the two share has so much more tenderness than that of the “normal” relationship between Penny and Leonard. The writing is superb at these points where the team find a double entendre in what is often something as simple as rubbing vapo-rub on a chest, or dissecting monkey brains. It seems to hark back to the dialogue in the great screwball comedies such as Bringing Up Baby or Some Like it Hot.  I find myself as a bystander in what must be one of the oddest pairings of individuals ever (aside from Ryan Gosling and Bianca in Lars and the Real Girl) willing for Sheldon to see the light, or Amy to finally take matters into her own hands and show him what he’s missing!

Also, without Sheldon the show would not be devoid of giggles (it’s still a funny show with some great gaffes and good set-ups) but the real roars and belly laughs would be gone. As mentioned before while the other jokes are wearing thin, we’ve already seen the “he must be hiding in the closet” character a hundred times and there are plenty of other shows that give us a few good Jewish on-liners; but as of yet no one has put whatever Sheldon is on screen, there must still be a goldmine of situations to drop him in and just let the character write itself. Let’s take Sheldon to the zoo, the swimming pool, God forbid church and just see what happens.


Moving into more general Big Bang terms – why is the show so successful other than the character of Sheldon; because, it’s made geeky cool. The nerd was becoming less as less of the bridesmaid and finally allowed to be the bride; no longer simply the supporting character they were now the protagonist. Over my lifetime it’s no longer a big deal if you collect comic books, superhero’s are downright mainstream now and being overtly involved in your favourite TV show is accepted (though blogging about  them for more than 1000 words might be pushing it a little!). The Big Bang Theory came about just as it was becoming more and more acceptable to be a nerd riding the wave of the zeitgeist, just as all good TV should. 
Though, ‘Shouting into the Viod’ (http://butmyopinionisright.tumblr.com/post/31079561065/the-problem-with-the-big-bang-theory) blogged this about the Big Bang theory:

And here’s my issue, here’s why The Big Bang Theory makes me feel uncomfortable. We aren’t laughing with Leonard, Sheldon, Raj and Howard. We’re laughing at them. Chuck Lorre has given us four exceptionally intelligent, nerdy main characters and he’s positioned us as an audience against them. When I watch Big Bang it becomes more and more obvious that I’m not supposed to relate to the guys (or more recently Amy Farrah-Fowler). I’m expected to relate to Penny. You only need to pay attention to the audience laughter to realise that TBBT relies on positioning us as an outsider to the nerds, as someone like Penny who doesn’t understand their references, their science, their vocabulary even, and who doesn’t care to learn.

The lengthy blog went on to explain that the author thought that Community was much more on the side of the nerds than TBBT (Thank you for that acronym!). Although I love Community I think that the show is far more concerned about being a self-referential post-modern construct than it is about celebrating nerd culture and praising the character of “the nerd” (although there is a healthy dabbling in it). The Greendale 7 are not and can never be real people, they are far, far too out there. They are a construct that can only exist in the world that the story has created, without Greendale there can be no them. Although we care for them, and more importantly for the school, there is no real interpersonal drama the group will always be accepted and always be loved no matter what hijinks they get up to next. TBBT really absorbs you into the world of what it means to be a geek because the four main characters, they are us, they suffer the same problems that we do and we feel for them in their struggles to be accepted in a world with little understanding of them. Shouting into the Void argues that we are Penny in the series observing the group whereas I would argue that Penny herself is more part of the group than we realise (she herself struggles to be accepted and one could even argue that she is a closet geek herself) rather she gives an outsiders perspective on the situations the group find themselves in and we can all laugh together at the absurdity of behaviours that we too demonstrate, it’s no bad thing. If you can’t laugh at yourself, who can you laugh at?!

I often wonder what it might be like to have a friend like Sheldon, although some of my friends have some social dysfunctions none are in the same league as Dr Cooper. Some viewers have asserted that Sheldon’s behaviour is consistent with Asperger syndrome but the writers have flat out denied that was a basis for the character. Series co-creator Bill Prady had this to say:

 "We write the character as the character. A lot of people see various things in him and make the connections. Our feeling is that Sheldon's mother never got a diagnosis, so we don't have one"

I think I’d like it.

It appears though that not everyone agrees with me, see the other side of the argument on why TBBT sucks so much here: http://www.sickchirpse.com/the-big-bang-theory-sucks/

No comments:

Post a Comment